How Mexico’s ‘Old Economy’ Quietly Powers Its Startup Boom

Abstract

Mexico’s startup narrative is often framed around fintech unicorns, rising venture capital, and the nearshoring boom. Yet much of the real momentum in Mexican tech is happening where traditional sectors meet new software and data tools. Manufacturing clusters, logistics corridors, small retailers, farms, clinics, and tourism hubs generate concrete operational problems—inefficiencies, informality, and friction in payments, logistics, and compliance—that define what local founders build. These same incumbents then become the earliest pilots, reference clients, and distribution partners for startups.

This paper analyzes how Mexico’s non‑tech industries quietly power the country’s startup ecosystem. Drawing on recent data about informality, sector-specific funding, and policy initiatives such as Plan México [1][2][3], it explains why Mexico’s “old economy” is central to understanding its “new economy.” It examines manufacturing and nearshoring, logistics and supply chains, retail and commerce, and agriculture and food, then explores recurring startup–incumbent collaboration models and regional patterns beyond Mexico City. Finally, it outlines implications for founders, investors, and policymakers seeking to build or support technology at this intersection, arguing that Mexico’s innovation story is fundamentally sector‑driven and deeply grounded in its productive base.

Background

Outside observers often describe Mexico’s tech ecosystem through a familiar set of metrics: fintech dominance, record funding rounds, and the rise of a few household‑name unicorns. In 2024, Mexican fintech startups attracted around US$2.2 billion in capital, accounting for roughly 74% of all venture funding in the country, reflecting strong investor appetite for digital financial services [2]. E‑commerce volumes reached approximately US$74 billion in 2023, underscoring the rapid digitization of consumer behavior [1]. These figures suggest a modern, finance‑and‑consumer‑led startup story comparable to other emerging markets.

But these headline numbers obscure a deeper reality. Mexico remains a manufacturing‑heavy, export‑oriented economy with significant regional inequality and a vast informal sector. As of 2020, an estimated 31.5% of GDP came from the informal economy, involving around 55% of the workforce [1]. SMEs and micro‑businesses dominate; neighborhood shops (tienditas), family‑run farms, small logistics operators, and private clinics account for much of everyday economic life. For these actors, the most urgent problems are not social gaming apps or speculative crypto products, but practical issues: access to working capital, reliable logistics, compliance with complex regulations, and basic digitization of paper‑based workflows.

These structural features fundamentally shape Mexico’s startup trajectory. Traditional industries generate the “real economy” frictions that founders seek to solve: fragmented supply chains, cash‑based transactions, opaque pricing, and manual processes. At the same time, they provide the first paying customers, pilots, and data-sharing relationships that allow early‑stage startups to mature. Manufacturing plants in Nuevo León test predictive maintenance systems; agricultural cooperatives pilot crop‑monitoring tools; large retailers distribute SME fintech products through their networks. In this sense, Mexico’s old economy is not a separate context but the substrate of its digital transformation.

Public policy increasingly recognizes this interdependence. The government’s Plan México, launched in January 2025, aims to place the country among the world’s top ten economies by attracting foreign direct investment and creating high‑value manufacturing jobs [3]. The strategy includes tax incentives and accelerated depreciation on new fixed assets—deductions ranging from 35% to 91%—plus an additional 25% deduction on incremental training and innovation expenses between 2025 and 2030 [2]. A separate 2023 decree targets nearshoring investments in semiconductors, automotive electromobility, medical devices, agribusiness, and food production, offering immediate deductions and training incentives [3]. These measures, coupled with an R&D tax credit of 30% for qualifying innovation expenses up to MXN 50 million per year [4], reinforce a model where digital startups and traditional producers are co‑evolving.

Methods

This paper synthesizes qualitative and quantitative evidence from recent analyses of Mexico’s economy, startup activity, and public policy. Key inputs include data on informality and its contribution to GDP and employment, sector‑specific venture capital flows in fintech and agtech, and policy documents outlining tax incentives and nearshoring strategies [1][2][3][4]. These sources were combined with descriptive ecosystem insights on regional patterns of startup formation and the role of universities, infrastructure, and local industries in shaping entrepreneurial activity [5][6][7][8].

The research approach was thematic rather than exhaustive. First, high‑level statistics on informality and digital adoption were used to frame the structural context in which traditional and tech sectors interact. Second, sectoral descriptions (manufacturing, logistics, retail, agriculture) were examined to identify recurring pain points that create openings for startups. Third, funding data for Mexican fintech and agtech in 2023–2024 were used as proxies for where investors see scalable solutions emerging from these sectors [2]. Fourth, policy initiatives like Plan México, R&D tax credits, and nearshoring incentives were analyzed to understand how the state attempts to link advanced manufacturing, export competitiveness, and innovation [2][3][4].

Comparative insights on regional and urban‑rural disparities in startup activity from European and global studies were used illustratively, not as direct analogues, to highlight how similar mechanisms—such as the presence of higher education institutions and infrastructure quality—are likely to operate in Mexico [5][6][7][8]. The analysis then organized these findings into narrative sections: sector deep dives, collaboration patterns, shaping of innovation models, regional lenses, and implications for different stakeholders. Throughout, only information grounded in the cited research context is used; where patterns are inferred, they are clearly linked back to the structural features and data described in these sources.

Key Findings

Manufacturing & Nearshoring: Factory Floors as Testbeds for Industry 4.0

Manufacturing is one of Mexico’s economic pillars. Automotive, aerospace, and electronics production are concentrated in clusters across states such as Nuevo León, Querétaro, and Baja California, which function as tightly integrated cross‑border supply chains with the United States [3]. The 2023 nearshoring decree explicitly targets these sectors—semiconductors, electrical and electronic equipment, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, agribusiness, and human and animal food—with fiscal incentives for companies that relocate or expand operations in Mexico [3]. Plan México extends this logic through 2030 by enabling accelerated depreciation of 35%–91% on new fixed assets and a 25% additional deduction on incremental training and innovation spending [2].

These incentives amplify demand for digital tools, because the companies moving or expanding into Mexico are under pressure to maintain global efficiency and quality standards. On the ground, this translates into needs for factory automation, quality control systems, predictive maintenance, and workforce upskilling platforms. Local startups emerge to meet these needs, often in partnership with anchor manufacturers that provide plants as living laboratories. The result is a pattern where early customers are not speculative users but large factories with clear ROI expectations—reducing downtime, scrap rates, or energy consumption.

Nearshoring also changes who buys Mexican tech. Instead of selling only to local firms, startups can offer SaaS and industrial IoT solutions to global manufacturers operating in Mexico, effectively exporting software through embedded contracts. The combination of tax incentives and R&D credits—30% on incremental innovation expenses up to MXN 50 million per year [4]—encourages both incumbents and startups to co‑invest in pilots and joint development. In practice, a predictive maintenance startup might co‑fund hardware sensors and integration work with a factory, using R&D credits on both sides, and later scale the solution across the manufacturer’s regional plants.

Logistics & Supply Chain: Turning a Transit Country into a Data Country

Mexico’s geography makes it a natural logistics corridor between North and South America and a bridge between Asia and the U.S. via Pacific and Gulf ports. This role, however, exposes systemic frictions: port congestion, last‑mile delivery challenges in sprawling urban regions, complex customs procedures, and burdensome cross‑border documentation [3]. These frictions are costly for exporters and importers alike, especially as nearshoring accelerates trade volumes.

Startups respond by building freight marketplaces that match shippers with trucking capacity, route optimization tools that reduce fuel and time costs, cross‑border compliance platforms that automate documentation and tariff calculations, and warehouse management systems that digitize inventories. The demand originates directly from traditional players—trucking companies, customs brokers, and exporters—who see tangible cost savings in digitization. Crucially, these incumbents provide not just revenue but also real‑time data on cargo flows, transit times, and bottlenecks.

Because many logistics operators remain partially informal or under‑digitized, solutions often need to coexist with paper and cash. Platforms designed for the Mexican context must handle hybrid workflows, such as digitally pre‑filling documentation that is still physically stamped at customs, or reconciling digital freight payments with drivers who are paid partly in cash. Here again, the informal economy—accounting for 31.5% of GDP and 55% of the workforce as of 2020 [1]—shapes product design. Rather than imposing fully formalized, end‑to‑end platforms, Mexican logistics startups frequently prioritize modular tools that can be adopted in stages.

Retail & Commerce: Tienditas as Fintech Gateways

Retail in Mexico is defined by coexistence. Modern supermarket and convenience store chains operate alongside millions of tienditas and informal vendors that remain heavily cash‑based. Despite the rapid growth of e‑commerce—US$74 billion in market volume in 2023 [1]—cash is still the dominant payment method, revealing a substantial digital payment adoption gap. This gap is both a constraint and an opportunity: it limits the scalability of fully online models but creates room for hybrid solutions that blend physical and digital touchpoints.

Startups at this interface focus less on consumer entertainment and more on enabling transactions and working capital. Point‑of‑sale systems tailored to small shops, B2B marketplaces connecting tienditas to wholesalers, inventory financing products, buy‑now‑pay‑later offerings for SMBs, and social commerce tools are all responses to the way retail operates in practice. The fact that fintech captured 74% of Mexican venture funding in 2024 [2] is best understood as a reflection of these ground‑level needs. Many of these products are not purely digital wallets; they are credit, invoicing, and loyalty solutions embedded in everyday retail workflows.

Traditional retail incumbents play an important distribution role. Large chains, wholesalers, and telcos can bundle a startup’s POS software or micro‑loan product with their existing offerings to small merchants, instantly exposing the startup to thousands of customers. Because many tienditas operate informally, startups design products that do not require full formalization on day one, but instead help merchants progressively build transaction histories and eligibility for credit. In effect, retail becomes the channel through which informal actors are gradually drawn into semi‑formal digital systems.

Agriculture & Food: Informality, Climate Risk, and the Rise of Agtech

Agriculture remains vital for Mexico’s economy, both for domestic food security and for exports. The sector is characterized by a mix of large agribusinesses and smallholder farmers, many of whom operate informally and face chronic constraints: limited access to credit, scarce weather and soil data, inadequate logistics, and volatile prices [1]. Water stress in various regions and exposure to climate risk add another layer of uncertainty.

These structural weaknesses have spurred a wave of agtech startups focusing on farm management software, digital input marketplaces, crop‑monitoring tools, climate‑risk analytics, and traceability systems. Funding patterns reflect this momentum: in 2024, Mexican agtech startups raised around US$600 million to tackle food, water, and supply chain challenges using AI, IoT, and blockchain technologies [2]. Startups often work with producer cooperatives or agribusiness intermediaries to reach fragmented smallholders, using them as initial pilots and data partners.

As in other sectors, informality shapes how solutions are designed and sold. Smallholders with limited collateral find it difficult to access traditional credit; digital platforms attempt to fill this gap by using farm‑level data and transaction histories to underwrite loans. Logistics tools seek to aggregate supply and coordinate transport, mitigating post‑harvest losses. Traceability systems help exporters comply with stringent international standards, particularly in the U.S. and EU markets, while creating digital records that can support financing and insurance products. Agtech, therefore, does not just optimize farms; it nudges them toward more formal, data‑rich participation in supply chains.

The Informal Economy as a Hidden Innovation Engine

Across all these sectors, informality is not only a constraint but also a driver of innovation. With 31.5% of GDP and 55% of the workforce in the informal economy as of 2020 [1], vast segments of Mexico’s productive base operate outside formal regulatory frameworks. This reduces access to finance and advanced technologies but also forces entrepreneurs to develop creative, low‑friction solutions tailored to local realities.

Fintech offers the clearest illustration: the surge of capital into Mexican fintech—US$2.2 billion in 2024, or 74% of all VC funding [2]—is driven by the need to serve unbanked and underbanked populations. Digital financial services provide alternatives to traditional banking that better match income volatility and documentation gaps. Similarly, in agriculture, the US$600 million in 2024 agtech funding [2] targets problems rooted in informal land tenure, fragmented markets, and weak infrastructure. Rather than trying to formalize everything at once, many startups build tools that work with partial documentation, mobile‑first interfaces, and distributed agent networks.

The interplay between informality and tech also underscores the importance of inclusive digital infrastructure. Despite the e‑commerce boom, the dominance of cash points to barriers in digital payment adoption—ranging from trust issues to connectivity gaps [1]. Efforts to integrate informal workers and enterprises into the formal economy via digital platforms—such as SME accounting tools, portable benefits systems, or marketplace‑based compliance services—can boost productivity and tax collection while expanding markets for startups.

Table 1: Selected Indicators of Mexico’s “Old–New Economy” Interface

Comparative Analysis

Sectoral Contrasts: Manufacturing vs. Retail vs. Agriculture

Manufacturing‑driven startups typically emerge in environments that are more formal, capital‑intensive, and globally integrated. Automotive and electronics plants in the industrial north are embedded in multinational supply chains and subject to strict quality standards [3]. This context favors startups offering sophisticated Industry 4.0 tools—predictive maintenance, industrial IoT, and analytics—because customers have both the budget and the organizational maturity to implement them. The trade‑off is that sales cycles are longer and integration requirements more demanding; startups must navigate complex procurement processes and comply with corporate IT and security policies.

Retail‑oriented startups, by contrast, operate closer to the mass market and deal more directly with informality. Tienditas and small merchants may lack formal accounting, steady connectivity, or even bank accounts [1]. This pushes innovators toward lightweight, mobile‑first tools that deliver immediate value (e.g., inventory credit, simplified payments). Customer acquisition can be faster but more fragmented, requiring distributed sales agents and partnerships with wholesalers or telcos. The upside is potentially huge scale; the downside is thinner margins and higher support costs.

Agriculture sits somewhere between these poles. Large agribusinesses resemble manufacturing clients in their formalization and export orientation, while smallholders resemble informal retailers. Agtech startups must often balance serving both segments—selling enterprise software to big producers while designing accessible tools for small farmers. This duality creates execution complexity but also resilience: agtech firms can diversify revenue across higher‑ticket B2B contracts and volume‑based smallholder services.

Regional Lenses: Industrial North vs. Services Hubs vs. Agricultural Regions

Regional variation further differentiates the kinds of startups that emerge. The industrial north and Bajío region—states like Nuevo León, Coahuila, Querétaro, and Baja California—host dense clusters of manufacturing plants and export‑oriented SMEs, as well as universities and technical institutes specializing in engineering and applied sciences [3]. This mirrors global patterns where urban and industrial regions concentrate startups: in the EU, for instance, 76% of startups were based in cities in 2024, with rural areas hosting only 6% [5]. In Mexico, analogous dynamics likely drive the rise of industrial IoT, export‑oriented SaaS, and AI‑driven enterprise tools around cities such as Monterrey and Guadalajara.

Other regions foster different profiles. Tourist‑heavy states along the Caribbean and Pacific coasts see more hospitality and proptech ventures; agricultural regions in the center and south give rise to agtech and logistics startups. Northern border cities like Tijuana, Mexicali, and Ciudad Juárez benefit from nearshoring, spawning cross‑border logistics and back‑office services that serve U.S. clients while employing Mexican talent [3]. The presence of higher education institutions (HEIs) is a critical factor: research shows that regions with more HEIs exhibit higher entrepreneurial activity because they provide skills, networks, and R&D partnerships [6]. Infrastructure quality matters as well; regions with better transportation and digital connectivity show higher rates of startup formation and growth [7][8].

The trade‑off is that while industrial and urban hubs enjoy denser ecosystems and more venture capital, rural and peripheral regions risk being left behind. However, evidence from Europe suggests that rural areas can bridge the innovation gap by leveraging local industries such as agri‑food, transport, and energy; rural regions already host more than 11% of EU robotics startups despite lower overall startup density [5]. In Mexico, similar potential exists in agricultural valleys and logistics corridors, where sector‑specific demand can anchor specialized tech ventures even in the absence of large urban ecosystems.

Policy‑Driven vs. Market‑Driven Innovation

Another comparative dimension is the relative weight of policy incentives versus pure market demand. Plan México, nearshoring decrees, and R&D tax credits are explicit attempts to steer investment into advanced manufacturing, strategic exports, and innovation [2][3][4]. These measures lower the cost of capital expenditures and R&D for both multinationals and domestic firms, indirectly benefiting startups that can position themselves as innovation partners. Policy thus acts as a multiplier for sector demand: a manufacturer deciding to automate a production line under favorable tax conditions is more likely to engage startups in the process.

In sectors like retail and informal services, however, innovation is more market‑driven. The shift from cash to digital payments, the rise of e‑commerce, and consumer demand for convenience create natural openings for fintech and retail tech, independent of direct subsidies. Informal actors rarely benefit directly from sophisticated tax incentives; instead, they respond to tools that immediately improve their economics or reduce risk. This means startups in these sectors must be hyper‑attuned to user incentives and willingness to pay, while relying less on public co‑funding.

The trade‑off is that policy‑aligned sectors may enjoy more stable, long‑term planning horizons and better access to institutional partners, but can be exposed to regulatory swings and bureaucratic hurdles. Market‑driven sectors can move faster and experiment more freely but may struggle with fragmented demand and lower spending power. Mexico’s ecosystem, therefore, reflects a mosaic of innovation logics shaped by both state strategy and grassroots economic behavior.

Case Studies

Case 1: An Industrial IoT Startup in Nuevo León

Consider a hypothetical industrial IoT startup based in Monterrey, in the state of Nuevo León. Its founders, former engineers from an automotive plant, build a platform that collects sensor data from factory equipment to predict failures and schedule maintenance. Their first client is a Tier‑1 auto supplier attracted by nearshoring incentives that relocated a new assembly line to Mexico in 2024 [3]. The supplier faces pressure to maintain uptime and reduce scrap, making predictive maintenance a priority.

The startup negotiates a pilot under which hardware sensors and integration work qualify for accelerated depreciation and R&D credits on the client’s side [2][4]. Using this arrangement, the corporate reduces its taxable income while the startup gains a subsidized testbed and a prestigious reference. After demonstrating a 15–20% reduction in unplanned downtime, the startup scales its solution to additional plants owned by the same supplier and then to other manufacturers in the region. Over time, it evolves from a project‑based integrator into a subscription‑based SaaS provider, exporting its software to factories across North America.

Case 2: Retail Fintech Riding on Wholesaler Distribution

In central Mexico, a retail‑focused fintech targets tienditas that struggle with cash management and inventory financing. The founders partner with a large FMCG wholesaler that supplies thousands of small shops. Instead of trying to onboard merchants one by one, the startup embeds its credit scoring and BNPL product into the wholesaler’s ordering system. When shop owners place restocking orders, they can choose to pay partially on delivery and partially via a short‑term digital loan.

Because many merchants operate informally, the fintech does not require formal financial statements. Instead, it uses order histories and repayment behavior recorded through the wholesaler’s system as the basis for underwriting. Over time, this data serves as a proto‑credit file that can be shared—with permission—with banks or larger lenders. The arrangement aligns incentives: the wholesaler sells more goods, the startup gains rapid distribution and proprietary data, and merchants access working capital without navigating formal banking channels that often exclude them [1][2].

Case 3: Agtech Platform Serving a Mixed Farm Base

In an agricultural region of western Mexico, an agtech company offers a platform that combines satellite‑based crop monitoring, input recommendation, and market access. Its initial anchor client is a large export‑oriented agribusiness that needs traceability and yield optimization to meet international standards and manage climate risk. The partnership allows the startup to fund R&D activities, including field experiments and data integration, potentially qualifying for the 30% R&D tax credit [4].

At the same time, the startup works with a cooperative of smallholder farmers who access the platform via low‑cost smartphones or local agents. For these farmers, the platform’s primary value is better price information and access to buyers, not necessarily advanced analytics. By serving both segments, the startup amasses a rich dataset on crop performance and market dynamics. It then collaborates with a financial institution to design weather‑indexed insurance and input loans based on this data, further integrating informal producers into more formalized risk and credit markets [1][2].

Limitations

While this analysis highlights the centrality of traditional sectors in Mexico’s startup ecosystem, several limitations should be noted. First, the quantitative data cited—such as the share of GDP in the informal economy (31.5% in 2020), informal employment (55% of the workforce), fintech and agtech funding (US$2.2 billion and US$600 million respectively in 2024), and e‑commerce volumes in 2023—provide only high‑level indicators [1][2]. They do not capture the full diversity of regional ecosystems, subsector dynamics, or the performance of individual startups. More granular datasets on deal‑level funding, sector breakdowns, and regional startup density in Mexico would allow for a more precise mapping of where and how traditional industries are driving innovation.

Second, the paper relies on policy descriptions, such as Plan México and nearshoring decrees, whose impacts will unfold over several years [2][3]. The extent to which tax incentives and R&D credits actually change corporate behavior and startup–incumbent collaboration patterns remains partly speculative. Similarly, examples of startup–corporate interactions are generalized rather than drawn from named companies, to avoid extrapolating from a small sample. This approach clarifies patterns but may understate outliers, such as consumer‑oriented apps that achieve scale without deep ties to traditional sectors.

Third, comparative references to European and global research on urban‑rural disparities, the role of HEIs, and infrastructure are illustrative [5][6][7][8]. While the mechanisms they describe are likely relevant to Mexico, direct empirical studies of Mexican regional ecosystems would be needed to confirm the strength and nuances of these effects. Finally, the analysis does not deeply address political, security, or macroeconomic risks that can affect both traditional industries and startups, such as crime, regulatory shifts, or currency volatility. These factors can significantly shape investment decisions and operational strategies, and warrant further investigation.

Implications

For founders, the central lesson is that deep sector knowledge is a competitive advantage in Mexico. Understanding how a specific traditional industry actually operates—the informal norms, cash flows, regulatory gray areas, and technical constraints—enables entrepreneurs to identify high‑value problems and design solutions that can be adopted incrementally. Long‑term relationships with incumbents are often more important than rapid user growth; a single anchor manufacturer, wholesaler, or agribusiness can provide revenue stability, data access, and credibility that are hard to replicate through purely digital channels.

Investors, particularly foreign ones, need to evaluate Mexican startups through this sectoral lens. Metrics such as the depth of integration with legacy systems, the quality and duration of enterprise pilots, the presence of anchor clients in traditional industries, and the ability to navigate regulatory and informal environments may be more predictive of success than top‑line user counts. In fintech and agtech, for example, the strength of partnerships with retailers, cooperatives, or public programs can signal scalability and defensibility. Understanding how public policies and tax incentives shape corporate procurement budgets and innovation agendas is also critical for assessing timing and market potential [2][3][4].

For policymakers, the findings underscore the importance of aligning industrial, digital, and innovation policies. Infrastructure investments—in logistics, connectivity, and energy—directly affect both traditional productivity and the addressable market for tech solutions [7][8]. Programs like INADEM and R&D tax credits should be coordinated with sectoral strategies in manufacturing, agriculture, health, and tourism to encourage co‑development of technologies that serve concrete needs [4]. Facilitating public procurement of startup solutions, simplifying regulatory compliance for digital services, and supporting digital inclusion for informal workers can further strengthen the feedback loop between old and new economies. By treating startups as integral partners in sector modernization rather than as a separate “innovation” silo, Mexico can deepen the impact of both industrial and tech policy.

Conclusion

Mexico’s tech ecosystem cannot be understood in isolation from its traditional industries. Manufacturing clusters, logistics corridors, retail networks, farms, clinics, and tourist hubs generate the persistent, large‑scale problems—operational frictions, credit gaps, compliance burdens, and information asymmetries—that define Mexican startup opportunities. These sectors provide not only demand but also pilots, data, and distribution channels, quietly powering the country’s startup boom from behind the scenes.

The interplay between a large informal economy, a manufacturing‑driven export model, and targeted policy incentives such as Plan México and R&D tax credits has produced a distinct profile of innovation [1][2][3][4]. Mexican startups are disproportionately focused on B2B and B2B2C models that solve tangible bottlenecks in payments, logistics, and production, rather than on discretionary consumer apps. They often integrate with legacy systems, coexist with partial digitization, and rely on in‑person sales and support. Regional variation—industrial north vs. agricultural regions vs. tourist destinations—further diversifies the kinds of technologies that emerge.

Looking ahead, the depth of collaboration between traditional incumbents and startups will largely determine whether Mexico can convert nearshoring and digitalization into broad‑based productivity gains. Founders who master the nuances of specific sectors, investors who understand the operational realities behind the metrics, and policymakers who align industrial and innovation strategies will be best positioned to shape this trajectory. The real story of Mexican tech, in other words, is not a break from the old economy but its gradual, data‑driven reinvention.

References

[1] ABAC. "E‑Formalization: Empowering Informal Workers and MSMEs Through Digital Transformation." https://km.fti.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ABAC_E-Formalization_Report.pdf

[2] Startup Genome. "Mexico City: Global Startup Ecosystem Report." https://startupgenome.com/ecosystems/mexico-city

[3] UNCTAD Investment Policy Monitor. "Mexico: Implements New Incentives to Promote Nearshoring." https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-policy-monitor/measures/4482/implements-new-incentives-to-promote-nearshoring

[4] ABGI. "Innovation Funding Incentives: Mexico R&D Tax Credit." https://www.abgi-uk.com/innovation-funding-incentives-mexico/

[5] European Commission Joint Research Centre. "Europe’s Rural Regions Bridge Innovation Gap." https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/europes-rural-regions-bridge-innovation-gap-2025-10-29_en

[6] ScienceDirect. "Higher Education Institutions and Entrepreneurship: Regional Evidence." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733321001761

[7] Energizing Entrepreneurs. "Infrastructure and Entrepreneurship Development." https://www.energizingentrepreneurs.org/file_download/inline/e6e48fbc-bf5e-4f98-bfab-d9bed599faf8

[8] International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology. "Impact of Infrastructure on Entrepreneurship in Developing Regions." https://ijsrst.com/index.php/home/article/download/IJSRST24115125/IJSRST24115125/1176

[9] Jones Day. "Mexican Government Releases Plan México." https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/02/mexican-government-releases-plan-mexico

[10] EY Tax News. "Mexico Offers New Tax Incentives Under Plan México Strategy." https://taxnews.ey.com/news/2025-0303-mexico-offers-new-tax-incentives-applicable-across-all-industries-and-geographies-under-plan-mexico-strategy

[11] Mexico Histórico. "Mexico’s Strategy for Attracting Foreign Tech Investment." https://www.mexicohistorico.com/paginas/Mexico---s-Strategy-for-Attracting-Foreign-Tech-Investment.html